Is Bank Transfer Day a Small Bank Trojan Horse?

"A Good Day to be a Credit Union" is the headline of an article from Myriam Digiovanni in the October 19 Credit Union Times discussing the upcoming November 5 "Bank Transfer Day".

REALLY??

According to numerous news articles and coverage in both mainstream and social media, community banks and credit unions across the country are rallying around the anti-bank sentiment that has germinated from the announcement of a $5 debit card fee by Bank of America on September 29 and the increase in fees by other large banks. Not only have new account openings reportedly increased at several large credit unions, but social media traffic on the official Bank Transfer Day Facebook page and on other national credit union sites such as www.ASmarterChoice.org and www.CULookup.com have also seen spikes.

But is all this attention and potential new business a fortuitous gift or a potential threat to the well being and revenues of community banks and credit unions? It may just depend on who you ask and how the financial institutions on the receiving end of the disgruntled customer exodus handle their new customers and members.

Bank Relationship Inertia is Powerful
First of all, the number of people who are complaining may be much higher than those willing to switch. "As angry as you might be, the effort of figuring out some alternative relationship, choosing one, getting set up and the risk that the new one might be no better than the old one . . . those are huge costs," states Peter Fader, a marketing professor at The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania in an interview with the Chicago Tribune. "Personal relationships, the accumulated points, the brand relationship, the start-up costs and the learning curve are all intangible costs, but they are very powerful," Fader goes on to say.

The power of the relationship is also reinforced in an academic study conducted by Purdue University entitled, 'Relationships and Individual's Bank Switching Behavior' where a very weak correlation was found between the propensity to switch banks and pricing. In contrast, a much higher correlation was found between the depth and tenure of relationship and the propensity to stay with a current financial institution.

Banks have worked hard to achieve engagement with their customers through the cross-selling of additional products and services such as direct deposit, online and mobile banking, online billpay and other services. At Bank of America, there is even the possibility of a linked savings account established as part of the Keep the Change savings program. This 'stickiness', in addition to the potential tangible costs of switching at some banks who may charge a fee for closing an account (especially a newly opened account where a premium or offer may have been involved) make the changing of banks daunting for many.

The Friction of the Switch Process
For those consumers who decide to switch, many will not complete the switch process either by not associating the aforementioned engagement services or by not funding the new relationship. As a personal example, while my family moved from California to Ohio over three years ago, I have not completely severed ties with my previous bank where direct deposit and automatic payments still remain. While my new banking relationship in Ohio is sufficiently funded to avoid fees, my primary checking relationship remains in California.

According to a brand new research report from Javelin Strategy and Research, 'Faulty Process Hobbles FIs in the Battle for Acquisition, Profitability and Retention', the process of opening account online is both flawed and frustrating. In a study of the top 10 banks and 5 technologically advanced smaller organizations, the likelihood of being able to successfully open and fund a new checking account is just slightly over 50%. If you are new to a financial institution, the chances of success go down even further.

With almost one quarter of new account holders opening their desired account online in 2011, the financial and relationship impact of a poor online account opening process is significant. Hampering the process at many banks is the fact that there may not be a way to open the accounts online according to the Javelin study.

The Demographics of the Disgruntled
According to an American Bankers Association study conducted in August, as many as 70% of consumers don't pay anything for their checking account today. These households either were enrolled in a Free Checking account or (more likely) held balances or related services that allowed the fees on the account to be waived. Of those households surveyed, an additional 11% paid fees of $3 or less. That leaves only 19% of U.S. households that were paying a fee of more than $3 a month for checking as of the August survey date.

So who is still paying a fee and might be the most vocal of the disgruntled? Most likely, it is those households who do not carry an adequate balance in their account(s), do not have a direct deposit or online banking relationship, or do not have a deep enough relationship to get their fees waived.

The scenario that Bank of America (and other large banks) may be actually 'firing' unprofitable, low balance relationships was well documented in Ron Shevlin's blog, 'Maybe Bank of America Has a Plan'. With the new fee being imposed, the customer has the choice to pay a fee for their debit card at Bank of America, expand their relationship at Bank of America or leave. In his post, Ron shows how Bank of America's profitability could actually increase with the diminishment of lower balance accounts and how the recipients of these relationships (smaller banks and credit unions) could be adversely impacted by the influx of new customers.


The Importance of Engagement and Onboarding
Finally, for those customers who are walking into the doors of a new bank or credit union, the importance of a robust process of new customer engagement and onboarding couldn't be more important. According to Mike Bartoo, Regional Manager at Marquis and  financial industry veteran, "Hope is not a strategy" when it comes to building new relationships. According to Mike, banks should look back to the last 6 months of account openings to determine how well they have done with getting new customers to open 'sticky' services. If success in cross-selling has been poor, attrition has been more than desired and relationships are not profitable, there is no reason to believe the new influx of accounts will perform any better. In fact, the results may be worse.

I have covered the importance of engagement, onboarding and cross-selling extensively in this blog over the past two years, illustrating that the future profitability of a relationship often will be determined by a bank's outreach during the first 6 months of the relationship. History shows that most relationships that are unprofitable after 6 months remain that way.

So, while there may or may not be a significant amount of movement of accounts between financial institutions leading up to and following Bank Transfer Day on November 5, banks should be cautious of the types of accounts they open and determine whether they are prepared to make sure these new relationships are profitable (or are relationships at all).

What is your organization's perspective on Bank Transfer Day? Does your institution stand to benefit or lose from customers leaving or coming to your offices? Or will Bank Transfer Day be a non-event in your opinion?

I would love to hear your thoughts.

DDA Under Siege

As part of the planning committee for this year's BAI PaymentsConnect 2011, I would love to take credit for the great title of this program track, but I am not sure even the great minds at the BAI could have foreseen how apropos "DDA Under Siege" would be for bankers attending this year's conference that wraped up today in Phoenix.

If there was a unifying theme from the many sessions I participated in this week, it was that revenue lost from last year's Reg. E and this year's Durbin amendment can not be completely recaptured through repricing. Instead there needs to be a stronger focus on targeted customer acquisition, share of wallet growth strategies, retention, product innovation and cost containment. While everyone at the event seemed to be interested in what others were going to do around checking repricing, the energy was definitely focused on building a stronger platform for the future.

Sessions at the conference started with a review of the BAI/Finacle Innovation Imperative Customer Sentiment Study completed last Fall, which found that while there is still a ways to go in the customer's confidence in the economy and the banking industry in general, the view of bankers is more closely aligned with the consumer than in the past couple years. This uniformity of beliefs should assist as banks try to build messaging around their checking repricing and try to improve the customer experience. The study also found that the customer's perception of their bank being 'innovative' tends to correlate with satisfaction, product ownership and overall confidence in their bank.

Steve Mott from BetterBuyDesign followed the BAI research presentation with a very fast paced competitive overview of the payments industry, including a discussion around Google, PayPal and several potential payments platforms from the U.S. and even China. His message was that it will be up to the banks to leverage their customer relationships, distribution network and trust advantages to maintain some level of ownership of the consumer payments continuum. He emphasized, however, that the bank 'ownership' of payments is anything but guaranteed.

David Stewart, Senior Expert from McKinsey & Co. expanded on his recent BAI Banking Strategies article, emphasizing the continued importance of the debit card in the bank's payment product arsenal. In addition to providing financial metrics around the value of the debit customer and the real impact of repricing with net interest margin and other fees are included, he emphasized that trying to move mindshare or marketshare from debit to credit may be close to impossible in today's economic environment. David also shared the view of McKinsey that the potential for merchants to 'steer' payments from one payment vehicle or another was unlikely since doing so may actually cost the merchant more in discounts than could be retrieved in interchange savings.

David also left the attendees with the following strategies for trying to reposition the debit product in the future:

• Base debit strategy on new debit economics as opposed to the old economics
• Price products for competitive advantage
• Rationalize customers on the relationship level not just checking level
• Remember that the debit product is still sticky and builds customer engagement

Ending the morning sessions was a presentation by Hitachi Consulting around the findings of their semi-annual Consumer Payments Preference Study released last Fall. Some of the highlights included:

• The millennial generation provides a good opportunity for growing payment volume (especially around mobile)
• Ease of use and convenience drive payments behavior
• Debit is still the preferred payment method
• Credit for online purchases expected to increase
• Micropayments will continue to increase

Hitachi also emphasized that security continues to be a concern of consumers and is impacting the take up rate of mobile for payments.

The afternoon sessions revolved around ways that banks are trying to take back the payments franchise and extend relationships beyond just the DDA, with speakers from the Federal Reserve, Fiserv, Comerica, Fifth Third, Peak Performance Consulting, Novantas, TD Bank and Huntington Bank all providing unique viewpoints. It was clear during these sessions that the days of every bank having close to the same product set are over. While some of the larger banks may retain a Free Checking program (PNC's decision was referenced often during the conference), many are completely revamping their deposit product portfolios in a way that reinforces their brand and leverages their customer franchise. All of the banks were also bullish on credit products as well as the need to continue to capture increased share of wallet.

Hank Israel from Novantas stated that banks should segment their customers based on channel preference and will most likely price their product set in one of the following ways:

• Keeping Free Checking (hoping to make it up on volume)
• Fee for services (make it up within the checking product set)
• Product bundling (packaging product sets based on customer needs)
• Relationship pricing (drive value from relationship perspective)

A strong case was made for all banks to move more to a relationship focus that can optimize customer profitability and focus on customer needs.

Tuesday's sessions focused on how banks can go on offense through mobile banking, prepaid debit and mobile payments as well as how institutions can better defend their customer base through onboarding and rewards. Some of the key takeaways from the mobile banking session presented by FIS and M&I Bank included:

• Smart phones will be used by the majority of consumers by the end of 2012
• Mobile banking will surpass online banking by 2015
• Remote deposit capture is the 'power app' that engages the customer (more are needed)
• Mobile banking customers have a 53% lower attrition rate (Tower Group)
• Mobile banking customers decrease VRU use by 55%

The speaker from M&I Bank also emphasized the need for banks to build mobile banking critical mass quickly, with a focus on expanding the solution set coming after 'getting the basics done right'. He referenced that mobile banking customers at his bank had higher balances, increased check card usage, and a better bill pay adoption rate than similar customers without mobile banking.

Greg Schreacke from First Federal Savings Bank and Robert Gitner from Velocity Solutions discussed the market potential for prepaid debit and how a bank could build a checking product set around the card. Research was presented that showed the following characteristics of a prepaid debit user:

• 53% have a checking account
• 50%+ want a prepaid debit because of overdraft fees
• 47% want immediate access to funds
• 46% believe they can get better service at a retailer than a bank
• 43% have had a previous problem that limits their ability to open a traditional checking

In the mobile payment presentation done by Calvin Grimes from Fiserv and Emmett Higdon from Forrester Research, the impact that mobile banking has on the customer relationship was again emphasized. It was shown that not only is a customer who uses mobile banking 30% more likely to stay with a bank, but the customer is also 26% more likely to recommend their bank. The team emphasized that now was not the time for banks to stand on the mobile financial services sidelines, but instead should be searching for ways to move their mobile solutions from being simply informational to being more transactional.

While many banks are still trying to build the business case for mobile payments, the following benefits were shared:

• Customer acquisition and retention benefits
• Lower cost of servicing
• Revenue generation potential and revenue retention
• Competitive parity
• Better customer experience
• Deeper customer engagement

It was also mentioned that, while security and privacy concerns still remail around mobile payments, these concerns will eventually work in favor of traditional financial institutions since customers inherently trust banks more than companies like Google, Apple or even their phone company.

The presentation that I did in partnership with Bill Stamp from KeyBank focused on the market trends around onboarding as well as the basics on development and implementation of a successful onboarding program. Interestingly, when the attendees were informally polled as to their current onboarding programs, while the majority were doing something, less than half were using more than one communication channel, very few were leveraging three channels, and only one bank was communicating with their customers more than 5 times in the first 90 days. It was stressed that this lack of a focused and consistent onboarding process could hamper organization's objectives of improving customer engagement, increasing fee income and definitely hurt cross-sale and retention efforts.

Bill's presentation around KeyBank's onboarding program illustrated that developing and managing an onboarding initiative is an ongoing process where testing of offers, channels, and communication sequence and cadence is continuously needed. Bill also shared how an onboarding process can reinforce cross-selling done at the new account desk and the importance of reinforcing engagement with services before the cross-selling of other products.

To further reinforce the importance of engagement and retention in a highly competitive and revenue challenged marketplace, Tom Brooks from Regions Financial Corporation, Lynne Laube from Cardlytics, and Aaron McPherson from IDC Financial Insights showed how a highly innovative merchant-funded rewards program may be the answer for banks looking to move away from a 'reactive' interchange funded program to a 'proactive' program that could be bring higher value to the customer and even make money for a bank.

Lynne Laube discussed two macro trends in the banking industry that has paved the way for a merchant-funded program:

• Digitization of payments (where and how payments are made)
• How customers relate to banks (>50% have online banking with 7 visits a month to their online banking site)

The benefits of a program like Cardlytics offering shared by the panel included the ability to target actual transactions for incremental growth and engagement. The benefit to the customer is that offers will always be relevant, while the merchant benefits from only providing offers to people very likely to be interested in their services. Since the targeting potential is so strong, more valuable offers can be developed as opposed to when a merchant is discounting to the masses.

While the program at Regions is relatively new, the benefits included:

• No enrollment is required (all customers with online banking and electronic statements are included)
• Ease of value transfer (no coupons are needed since the customer can electronically 'activate' an offer and 'redeem' the offer simply by using their debit card)
• Immediate notification of earnings/rewards
• Rebates deposited directly into account
• Offers are targeted and relevant
• Integrated user experience
• Fully funded as opposed to being a contingent liability like with points programs

The success of this innovative rewards program was probably best illustrated when Lynne mentioned that Cardlytics is partnering with 2 of the top 5 banks already and expect their customer base to grow from 15M today to more than 60M by the end of the summer. For more information on Cardlytics, read my earlier blog on the company done last year.

Without a doubt, this was a well-timed conference covering a broad range of topics on the front burner of many banks. On each attendee 'to do' list upon leaving, I am sure there will be a review of any pricing changes not yet implemented, a strong focus on ways to engage and retain new and existing customers we can ill afford to lose, and a much more accelerated movement to future payment products like mobile and even P2P.

I would love to hear from other attendees about their experience and takeaways.

Checking Changes Make Onboarding and Cross-Selling More Important

Over the past several weeks, many of the larger banks across the country have announced significant changes to their checking account continuum, including elimination of traditional Free Checking, discontinuation of rewards programs, ceasing reimbursement of foreign ATM fees, as well as potential fees and transaction limits on debit cards.

While each of these strategies are intended to reduce costs or generate revenue in response to Reg E and the Durbin Amendment, these changes could also present a challenge to banks as they seek to increase engagement and gain share of wallet. This is because debit card use and rewards program enrollment were two of the more important account engagement criteria and basis for a broader relationship growth.

According to an economic analysis on the effects of the Durbin interchange amendment presented to the Federal Reserve Board on February 22, between $33.4-$38.6 billion of debit card interchange will be lost during the first two years the new rules are in effect. This reduces the revenue on a personal checking account by $56-$64 and by $79-$92 on a small business checking account according to the study. These impacts make it more important than ever to optimize onboarding and cross-sell efforts for retail and small business customers thereby reducing costly attrition, improving engagement and providing a stronger foundation for ongoing relationship expansion.

Here are several of the steps financial institutions should consider as they begin to implement changes to their deposit accounts and debit products.

• Double Down on Onboarding Initiatives: While most banks currently have an onboarding process for new retail customers, many have yet to build an onboarding process for small businesses. In addition, many programs only reach out to the customer once or twice and don't leverage a robust mix of communication channels. The impact of recent legislation makes the opportunity cost of attrition more expensive than ever. Banks need to increase the number of 'touches' a customer receives by email, phone and direct mail with the message centered on maximizing the benefits of using the account the customer just opened. When the account becomes active, then begin to expand the relationship.
• Don't Walk Away From Debit: While the economics of the debit card have definitely changed, the use of this payment vehicle remains better than many of the alternatives and provides the consumer with constant brand reinforcement each time they open their wallet. David Stewart from McKinsey & Company wrote in a recent BAI Banking Strategies article entitled, "Keeping Debit in Focus Post-Durbin" that debit cards remain an important component of the anchor DDA. As a result, getting new customers to activate and use their debit card as part of the onboarding process should continue to be a primary objective.
• Expand The Definition of Engagement: In the past, most banks focused on debit card utilization, enrollment in online banking (with bill pay) and the sign up for direct deposit in their onboarding messaging. While you don't want to cover too much in the onboarding communication, there are some households you may want to encourage to apply for a credit card and/or activate an autosave transfer as part of welcome process.
• Encourage Channel Migration: Another way to stem attrition, potentially reduce cost and build share of wallet is to increase alternative payments channel use. As part of the onboarding process, some of my clients are building messages around the use of mobile banking early in the relationship lifecycle. This makes sense based on recent trend research done by Javelin Strategy and the potential for offline customer mobile adoption found in research done by Fiserv. While there may only be minimal channel shift from a payments perspective initially, there could be significant savings if call center inquiries are reduced.
• Focus on Share of Wallet Early: While I totally agree with Ron Shevlin in his Marketing Tea Party blogs (Honeymooning and Why Engagement Matters) that a new customer must be courted and engaged before they can be cross-sold, customers define the pace of this trust building as opposed to the bank. This level of engagement/trust is usually found by looking at transaction volumes and whether engagement services are active. Once actively engaged, the customer should be offered additional services that may improve their overall banking experience. This is where product propensity models and behavioral segmentation can be effective.
• Leverage the New Account Desk: Many of my clients have found that the new account desk can  be an effective cross-selling environment for the customer, especially if credit services such as credit cards, personal or small business lines of credit and even equity credit are pre-approved at the point of sale. The point of sale is also the best place to discuss the correct account to open in the first place and the benefits of engagement services and rewards alternatives.

The effective communication of your checking account changes to existing customers has been discussed in my recent blog (Minimizing the Impact of 'Unintended Consequences'). It is just as important to communicate well with new customers at the new account desk in the days, weeks and months immediately following the new account opening. Without an aggressive communication process, leveraging multiple channels and customized to the customer's stage in the engagement process, the investment in acquiring the customer will be lost or the value of the relationship will not be optimized.

How are you going to ramp up your new customer communications to maximize your marketing ROI? Are you considering new ways of onboarding your customer in the first 30, 60 or 90 days? Have you found a way to leverage any social media in your onboarding process? I would love to hear your ideas.

Post Financial Reform Checking: Fee, Free or Wait and See?

With August 15 in the rear view mirror, the impact of the new regulations around overdraft protection (Reg E) are beginning to be played out in the marketplace. While most of the larger banks, such as Bank of America, Chase and Wells Fargo have declared an end to free checking without stipulations, most small and some regional banks such as US Bank, Suntrust and Capital One have left the product unchanged while many of the large regionals such as PNC, KeyBank and others appear to be adopting a wait and see approach.

In fact, according to research released this week from Moebs Services, only 63.6 percent of the largest banks currently offer free checking compared to 92.6 percent in 2009, while community banks’ use of free checking declined only declined from 78.3 percent to 71.7 percent.
As an industry, the offering of free checking dropped by 11 percent over the past year according to the study. This differential based on the size of organization may reflect the desire of the largest banks to improve the cost structure of their checking portfolio, while the offering of free by smaller banks may be a competitive repositioning of the free checking account as a possible counter to the national branch network advantage of the larger banks.

As I discussed in a BAI webinar this week entitled, Checking 2.0: Revenue Opportunities in a New Regulatory Environment, with the cost of maintaining a checking account being several hundred dollars a year, it appears that free checking, along with rewards programs and other benefits, could be the first major consumer banking casualty, as many banks reevaluate their checking continuum in the wake of the government’s financial reform.

But, is getting rid of free checking a good strategy? According to most research, free checking still has a strong appeal across virtually all demographic and economic segments. It even has a positive contribution margin (including the impact of Reg. E, Durbin and the current interest rate environment) when you remove shell accounts with little or no activity. Would it be better to eliminate some of the perks that have been added over the past few years such as free competitive ATM transactions? Many banks are also beginning to charge an annual fee for their rewards program after a first year fee waiver for their programs. Still other firms are considering removing rewards program offerings from their entry level free checking program.

Another way to offer a free product within your checking continuum is to offer free accounts only to customers opting for totally electronic accounts (ATM deposits and withdrawals, online statements and billpay) or to your most active or high balance customers. Bank of America is testing and electronic based checking account currently, where all fees can be avoided if the customer opts for electronic statements and does not use the branch for routine transactions. With a mobile banking customer base of over 4 million households, I suspect there is a strong appeal for this structure of product.

What is clear is that most institutions are reviewing the economics of this product offering and are doing extensive consumer and product research to build a new set of needs based products that are driven by the transaction and money management behavior of their customer base. They are attempting to move towards a stronger set of value based products with enhanced features and benefits while eliminating fixed costs that are associated with low margin (inactive) accounts to improve portfolio profitability.

Has your organization decided whether to offer free checking going forward? Have you introduced new products with enhanced benefits for a fee? Have you considered changing your rewards program? I would be interested in your thoughts.

BAI Checking 2.0 Executive Forum Recap

I just finished presenting at the second BAI Checking 2.0 Executive Forum in Chicago where close to 50 financial institutions learned about legislative changes, customer perceptions, new product development and marketing opportunities around the checking account. While only a month has passed since the first Checking 2.0 Executive Forum held in Atlanta, it is obvious that there are a number of changes occurring in the marketplace.

There was consensus among the participants that while consumer trust and confidence in banks has been negatively impacted by the events of the past two years, there may be some uptick in these measures over the next few months if financial results continue to improve and if banks continue to focus on the customer experience.


A significant change from the March event was that virtually all of the participating banks have developed an alternative version of 'Free Checking'. Checking account product innovation has added stipulations to some accounts, benefits for a fee on others and alternative reward structures on other checking programs. In fact, in a quick survey of the participating banks, it did not appear that any of the 'Free Checking' programs were similar.

When discussions moved to how banks are responding to Reg E, there were some organizations that were well on their way towards communicating with their customer base while other banks had not yet begun their information dissemination. Surprisingly, MB Financial out of Chicago shared that they had already achieved close to 85% opt-in from their customer base (and nearly 100% from new customers) by leveraging a combination of postcards, traditional direct mail, phone call follow-up and branch level involvement.

The success of some of the participating banks illustrated the importance of a multi-channel communication process with strong employee involvement and call center follow-up.

Free Checking Obituary

Seeing that a lot of industry writers seem to be already announcing the death of Free Checking as a likely outcome of Reg E, I thought it would be appropriate to write an obituary for this product that saw such an active and successful life.

While many may claim to be the father of this service, paternity tests will most likely point to Ralph Haberfeld as the individual who most nurtured this service during the formative years and who was the strongest proponent of the benefits of the fee income associated with Free Checking. Ten years ago, when some banks (and consultants) began "pushing" free checking, there was concern about losing the meaningful income of monthly fees associated with traditional checking accounts.


Well, here we are, ten years later, having the same concerns about NSF/OD fees. These fees, that grew faster than the growth of checking accounts, became the prime fee income driver of well over 60% of our industry in this past decade. Ever since the introduction of these fees, banks have found ways to optimize the opportunity with strategies such as 'large to small' check presentment order.

The Fed said it focused on ATM and debit card transactions for Reg E because these have been "a key driver behind the growth in the volume and cost of overdraft fees" (41% of NSF transactions). Finally, consumers and regulators both balked, which is, in part, why we're facing increased scrutiny and regulation.

So, is Free Checking really dead? Free Checking coupled with overdraft protection is a product that is still highly valued by a small but important segment of customers who prefer to use overdrafts as a way to make ends meet at the end of the month. The outgrowth of Reg E will most likely be pseudo Free Checking that includes relationship stipulations (direct deposit), transaction requirements (minimum number of signature debits) and/or channel restrictions (no teller access). There may even be Free Checking as we know it today for those households that decide to opt-in.

In other words, rumors of the death of Free Checking may have been greatly exaggerated.

Mintel Comperemedia Looks at Financial Service Mega-Trends

In a Mintel Comperemedia presentation recently, Economic Psychologist, Susan Menke, PhD. presented the trends that are expected to have the greatest impact on consumer financial behavior and the banking industry during 2010. Based on tracking of direct marketing programs during the last half of 2009, the following predictions were made:

• The end of Free Checking: Banks such as Fifth Third and BBVA have already eliminated the account while Free Checking leader TCF announced the end of their Free Checking program at their investor meeting this week.
• Explosion of reward banking: The decline in Free Checking will most likely result in an increase in checking programs with rewards, especially in light of the increased importance of direct deposit, online bill payment and debit card interchange.
• Account builder program introductions: Following the trend started by 'Keep the Change', 'Way2Save' and PNC's 'Virtual Wallet', automatic transfers from checking to savings and the linking of credit lines to checking will be two ways to expand relationships beyond a single service.
• More aggressive debit card marketing: The importance of interchange income to the financial viability of many relationships will lead to many more debit card activation and utilization promotions in 2010.
• Cash will continue to be king of offers: The offering of cash incentives for opening new accounts ramped up in the latter part of 2009 after a short hiatus. Chase continues to offer different bounties ranging from $100 to $200 and more with many other large banks following.
• Increased popularity of prepaid cards: While larger banks have not yet focused on prepaid cards, changes brought on by Reg E may change the way banks serve the underserved and unbanked segments.
• Expansion of mobile banking: There are still several large banks that have only rudimentary mobile banking initiatives while others such as Bank of America, Wells, USAA and Chase have created innovative iPhone Apps. The financial incentive to move more expensive transactions to the mobile channel and the rapidly increasing acceptance of smart phones is expected to fuel rapid growth of this channel.
• Proliferation of financial literacy programs: Customer experience research for years has indicated the importance of being more transparent, building trust and educating customers on how to make informed financial decisions. Mintel believes that 2010 will be a watershed year for banks to use customer advocacy as a competitive differentiator.
• Increased use of social media sites: The popularity and growth of social networking sites has made it impossible for financial institutions to sit on the sidelines. One firm is offering a service where customers can receive alerts through social networking sites rather than email while many banks are using these sites for enhancing or reinforcing their brand. Twitter is also used to broadcast changes in rates and to introduce new products.

Unlike 2009, where most banks significantly scaled back marketing efforts and were on the defensive, proactivity seems to be the norm in 2010. Product innovation, changes in pricing models, utilization of new channels and an increased emphasis on the customer experience will definitely put the spotlight on marketing.

New Checking Plans Emerge in Response to Reg E

Already experiencing loss of fee income due to lower transactions and lower OD/NSF fees resulting from higher balances, banks are beginning to develop and introduce new checking products that can supplement these lost revenues.

In place of traditional free checking accounts are value-based accounts that allow customers to customize their account for a fee. Features such as identity theft, rewards and even enhanced OD/NSF protection can be selected from a menu of enhancements that allow a bank to replace some of the fee income that already has been lost or will be lost in response to Reg E.

One of the first to build a new array of checking accounts was BBVA Compass which introduced Build to Order Checking more than two years ago.
With a foundation account that features online banking and bill payment, customers can select from a list of additional features for $2 a month. These range from double reward points or cash back on transactions to a free OD waiver, free foreign ATM transactions or interest on the acccount. Customers can even change the features they prefer as their checking behavior changes. According to representatives from the bank, this account represents approximately 80% of the new accounts opened. A few months ago, BBVA Compass expanded their product line to include a small business version of the Build to Order Checking.

Another interesting alternative offered by some banks is an account with a line of credit attached to cover any overdrafts on the account. Not necessarily new to the banking world, some of these accounts with a line of credit are regulated by Reg Z as a credit product as opposed to Reg E, which covers electronic payments.

Finally, there are some banks that are developing a much stronger online checking product with debit transactions and online bill payment requirements while some banks are linking checking accounts with savings accounts to enhance relationship depth and profitability.

It is clear that we are seeing a new wave of product innovation in response to market conditions and the upcoming new transaction regulations. I will continue to share new ideas as they are introduced.