Is Cash Really King?

The competition is again heating up in the checking account cash wars. In addition to banks that have traditionally offered cash incentives to open checking accounts such as JPMorgan Chase, Capital One, Fifth Third and PNC Bank, banks that in the past have offered premiums for the opening of new accounts like KeyBank are now also joining the money for checking acquisition game.

While incentives with some institutions are still $50-$75, many of the more aggressive institutions are offering rewards of $150-$200 to new customers that open accounts and meet some qualifying stipulations such as signing up for direct deposit, online billpay or a minimum number of signature debits. A recent program by Capital One offering $300 for a new account was the highest premium seen in years.

In a review of recent checking campaigns using the search service Mintel Comperemedia, more and more firms are offering the higher incentives. The question remains whether these high incentives pay off.

According to a 2009 study by Novantas, as many as 50% of new checking accounts are usually inactive when analyzed by looking at debit and credit transactions on the new account. In addition, the BAI has fielded many studies that find that as many as 30-40% of new accounts are closed during the first year. Unfortunately, many banks that I visit do not measure the new account activity level or rate of attrition as thoroughly as they measure the number of accounts that come in the front door. If measured using a full year view of the acquisition costs of new accounts, it is possible that some banks are paying double or triple their cash incentive for new relationships which may make the programs unprofitable from both a short and long term perspective.

It may be a more prudent strategy to reallocate this investment to strengthen current customer relationships through cross-sell and up-sell programs instead of attracting short-term, opportunistic customers with such high incentives.

Free Checking Obituary

Seeing that a lot of industry writers seem to be already announcing the death of Free Checking as a likely outcome of Reg E, I thought it would be appropriate to write an obituary for this product that saw such an active and successful life.

While many may claim to be the father of this service, paternity tests will most likely point to Ralph Haberfeld as the individual who most nurtured this service during the formative years and who was the strongest proponent of the benefits of the fee income associated with Free Checking. Ten years ago, when some banks (and consultants) began "pushing" free checking, there was concern about losing the meaningful income of monthly fees associated with traditional checking accounts.


Well, here we are, ten years later, having the same concerns about NSF/OD fees. These fees, that grew faster than the growth of checking accounts, became the prime fee income driver of well over 60% of our industry in this past decade. Ever since the introduction of these fees, banks have found ways to optimize the opportunity with strategies such as 'large to small' check presentment order.

The Fed said it focused on ATM and debit card transactions for Reg E because these have been "a key driver behind the growth in the volume and cost of overdraft fees" (41% of NSF transactions). Finally, consumers and regulators both balked, which is, in part, why we're facing increased scrutiny and regulation.

So, is Free Checking really dead? Free Checking coupled with overdraft protection is a product that is still highly valued by a small but important segment of customers who prefer to use overdrafts as a way to make ends meet at the end of the month. The outgrowth of Reg E will most likely be pseudo Free Checking that includes relationship stipulations (direct deposit), transaction requirements (minimum number of signature debits) and/or channel restrictions (no teller access). There may even be Free Checking as we know it today for those households that decide to opt-in.

In other words, rumors of the death of Free Checking may have been greatly exaggerated.

New York Times Attacks Chase Bank's First Reg E Communication

Chase Bank has already begun communication around Regulation E, and the New York Times (and more than 50 additional media outlets) are reacting quickly with a review of their direct marketing testing in an article titled, "Banks Apply Pressure to Keep Fees Rolling In". The article made special note of the part of the Chase mailing that stated, “Your debit card may not work the same way anymore, even if you just made a deposit. Unless we hear from you.” According to the NYT, the mailing continues to warn (in big red type), “If you don’t contact us, your everyday debit card transactions that overdraw your account will not be authorized after August 15, 2010 — even in an emergency,” with 'even in an emergency' underlined. Additional toned down versions of communication are also being tested by Chase, including a postcard that simply asks customers to be ready for future ways to say yes to debit card overdraft coverage.


As expected, the article positions the mail in a somewhat biased manner as the first in a series of heavy handed customer communications from banks across the country to maintain the high level of fee income currently generated. While the article references many industry marketing experts, most are quoted around how they are helping banks get customers to opt-in as opposed to referencing the experts who have done research around why consumers do not want OD coverage to cease.

From this initial outcry, it is apparent that banks will need to be careful as to the way they balance the communication of education around Regulation E with the desire for the most impacted households to continue to be covered. The New York Times article also illustrates the pressure our industry will feel in the coming months around the fees we charge for these services.

Now's the Time to Build Retirement Dialogue With Your Customers

In yesterday's post, I discussed the significant deposit growth being experienced by major banks and the opportunities and risks that can be associated with an economic environment of uncertainty. An often overlooked opportunity for account acquisition and relationship growth is delivering on consumer's retirement needs.

Now is the best time to reach out to customers and prospects in your market area and position your institution as the safe and secure place to place their retirement assets. And with retirement assets approaching $20 trillion, the opportunity is significant.


According to a 2008 study conducted by BAI Research and Mercatus LLC there were five key ways to be successful in the retirement market: (1) Position your bank as the local retirement specialist, including retirement dialogue in all relationship building conversations and providing a varied and competitive product offering; (2) Provide online information and tools that allow the customer to manage their retirement planning in much the same way as is done by current 401K providers; (3) Demonstrate problem solving capabilities around helping customers diversify and provide the tools for decision making; (4) Deliver a positive branch customer experience that relates to the retirement customer from a knowledge and retirement focus perspective; (5) Provide competitive and transparent pricing which reinforces the trust a customer must feel to transfer retirement funds to your bank. A summary of the most important factors is illustrated on the attached link.

With most consumers still very leary of the equity markets and still in the process of reviewing their current 401K providers, there has never been a better time to build a proactive retirement saving strategy at your institution. Not only should this strategy be implemented in the prime contribution periods from January - April, but throughout the year as consumers continue to move funds to protect their retirement nest egg.