Showing posts with label distribution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label distribution. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Traditional Banks At Risk Due to Digital Disruption

According to two recent reports from Accenture, 35 percent of banks' market share in North America could be in play by 2020 as traditional branch banking gives way to new digital players. The research also indicates that 15 to 25 percent of today's roughly 7,000 North American financial institutions could be gone as a result of consolidation before 2020.


To combat this shift, Accenture recommends that traditional providers take a radically new approach to distribution, combining a simpler yet more comprehensive branch offering with integrated digital services.


"Digital technology and rapid changes in customer preferences are threatening full-service banks that do business primarily through branches," said Wayne Busch, managing director of Accenture's North America banking practice and author of the report, A Critical Balancing Act: Retail Banking in the Digital Era. "Given the scale of these disruptions, traditional full-service banks, as a group, could lose significant market share by 2020 -- to banks that reorient around digital technologies and to new entrants from the retail and technology sectors."

Digital Disruption


New digital technologies, emerging digital competitors and the extremely rapid changes in customer preferences are threatening to dramatically impact those full-service banks that limit themselves to products and services that get distributed primarily through physical branch channels. The outside disruptors tend to be more agile and more innovative, while traditional banks are weighed down by unprofitable branches, legacy back offices and inefficient silos. 

Business as usual is no longer an option in an industry that could see up to 25 percent of U.S. banks disappear completely.

In conducting online interviews with more than 2,000 US retail banking customers of the 15 leading retail banks in the U.S., Accenture found that 71 percent said they were “satisfied” with their bank and 68 percent said they would be “extremely likely” to recommend their primary bank to a friend, family member or colleague. In addition, only 9 percent of those surveyed switched institutions over the past year.

This loyalty is fragile, however, since more than a quarter (26 percent) of bank customers who remain with their primary provider do so simply because they consider switching to be a hassle, while about half said they haven't seen a competing offer that was attractive enough to make them move. The survey also found that two-thirds of bank customers would consider a branch closure as inconvenient and nearly half would switch banks as a result.

Source: 2013 Accenture Retail Banking Survey

This not only exposes the tenuous relationship banks have with their customers. It also confirms that the right offering and approach can induce them to switch. "The core challenge for banks: how to build a seamless digital customer experience -- and optimize its power with a better and more cost-effective complimentary offering in the branches that customers find so attractive," concludes Accenture.

The Disruption Has Already Begun


According to Accenture, many banks have already begun losing their customers to digital disruptors. The survey showed that customers acquired 34 percent of traditional banking services such as CDs, money market accounts, personal and auto loans and even new checking and savings accounts from institutions other than their primary bank.


Source: 2013 Accenture Retail Banking Survey

While traditional players have the innate advantage of extensive branch networks that the customer still says they value (nearly 60 percent of new product sales are still closed in branches), these same players should be concerned about the the transition to an online sales environment.

The growth rates in online sales since 2012 are strong in several categories, with online auto loans growing from 11 percent to 21 percent in the past year, online sales of mortgages rising from 15 percent last year to 25 percent in 2013 and sales of personal loans through the online channels jumping from 8 percent to 24 percent in only one year.

Source: 2013 Accenture Retail Banking Survey

It is clear that the most fundamental question in the post-financial crisis environment has changed from "how do I find my future customer' to 'how do my future customers find me?" As discussed in my recent post, Is Your Bank Ready for Customer 3.0, digital shifts inside and outside the industry are rapidly changing the information flows and the way that financial firms and customers interact. It is imperative for banks to become an integral part of customers' lives with a ubiquitous presence wherever customers are.

The branch banking conundrum continues, however, since customers still use branches due to proximity. Branches continue to be the number one reason for loyalty and 78 percent believe they will use their branch as often or more often in five years' time. Conversely, with increased use of services like mobile deposit, there has been a 50 percent increase in the number of customers indicating they are using mobile banking in 2013 (32%) than in 2012 (21%).

Source: 2013 Accenture Retail Banking Survey

"The internet is now the most frequently accessed distribution channel on a monthly basis . . . well above the branch. And mobile use has soared in the past year, almost overtaking the ATM in its perceived importance to customers," says the survey.

While the migration to online and mobile channels has been somewhat additive as opposed to a complete transition of behavior, online and mobile banking will continue to weaken the branch's stronghold on the consumer as better applications and more seamless experiences are developed. This migration is imperative due to the high cost to build and maintain a branch and the misalignment between the cost and value of the branch channel.

Subscribe to Bank Marketing Strategies

A Path for the Future


In light of the digital disruption in the marketplace, and as expanded regulation, more onerous capital requirements, economic volatility and consolidation continues, banks need a lower cost operating model that can generate more predictable and sustainable revenues. Branch networks need to be restructured, reducing the number of large footprint offices and increasing the number of 'light' branches and kiosks.

And while some industry observers believe we are quickly moving to a 'branchless' industry, Accenture and others (myself included) believe the environment will be more of a 'less-branch' scenario, at least in the next five to ten years (Chase continues to add branch locations as do other large and mid-sized organizations). But there must be a response to the customer-centric capabilities of the digital players who can leverage big data and analytics to build a better customer experience.

Move to Digital

With inertia being the main reason current bank customers don't switch, traditional banks need to quickly mimic the new digital banking leaders. Agility and a stronger innovative culture will be required to compete effectively as our industry invests to upgrade our legacy back offices and deeper customer insights will need to be leveraged to provide real-time solutions to customer needs. 

As mentioned in my recent post, Bank Product Proliferation: Too Much of a Good Thing, banks and credit unions will also need to eliminate antiquated products, streamline offerings and build new services that leverage the new digital delivery capabilities. By using digital capabilities to track transactional and channel behavior, banks will be able to develop better services and offer new solutions in real-time. This enhances cross-sell opportunities and can increase share of wallet.

Restructure the Branch Network

According to the Accenture research, the top 25 U.S. banks spend more than $50 billion per year to maintain oversized and poorly placed branch networks. While Accenture acknowledges the importance of a branch network, they propose a less costly branch banking model that can balance the sales capability with the digital opportunity:
        • 'Light' branches: Oriented primarily to sales, these offices represent less than a third of the network and are highly automated with a minimal staff and reduced real estate footprint leveraging remote advisory specialists.
        • Kiosks: Representing up to half the total network, these units include feature heavy ATMs with video, and can handle routine transaction activities.
        • Full-service 'hubs': Similar to conventional branches (but fewer in number), these offices offer full sales and transactional support with extended hours and specialized advisors for services like mortgages, investments, business banking, etc.
        • Flagships: A minimal number of strategically located flagships will serve as the center of service-excellence, combining a full range of capabilities including expanded self-service tools.
While many banks are already experimenting with more open and flexible branch formats, there doesn't seem to be a silver bullet yet in response to the digital disruption occurring. A bigger question may be which branches to close or reconfigure, especially with the looming eyes of the Community Investment Act (CRA) regulators looking over the industry's shoulder.

"The acceleration in consumer acceptance of digital banking in the past year -- particularly in the areas of mobile banking and online banking product sales -- foreshadows the need for a very different banking landscape in 2020," said Goodson from Accenture. "Branches remain vital to banks, but they need to be reimagined as one one aspect of a radically new approach to consumers. It is an opportunity to recover profitability, reduce costs and to establish a much more sustainable relationship with customers into the future."

The Best of Both Worlds


Given the scope of disruption impacting our industry, organizations need to start their transformation today if they want to be relevant in the year 2020 according to the complimentary Accenture report, Banking 2020: As the Storm Abates, North American Banks Must Chart a New Course to Capture Emerging Opportunities

The winning formula may well be to combine the advantages of the traditional bank with the benefits of the digital bank. By reducing the cost structure of branches and optimizing the products and services provided, yesterday's banks can move into the future leveraging a core strategic asset (a reconfigured branch network) complemented by an enhanced digital experience across all channels.

To succeed, traditional banks must become significantly more agile (no more three year planning cycles), embrace an innovative culture (see my post Banking Innovation: Not Made in the U.S.A.), focus on simplification and optimization while delivering an exceptional customer experience . . . in real-time. This is a very lofty ambition for an industry that historically moves at a snail's pace, but there really are no options.

More importantly, traditional full-service banks must shift their operating philosophy from being a product-oriented organization to being a customer-centric organization with the ability to engage with customers anywhere, anytime they want.

The goal is to become a bigger part of our customers' daily lives and to become integrated with other industries in a seamless manner that reduces friction. Unfortunately, organizations such as PayPal, Square, Google and others are already moving quickly down this path, assuming the role of payments facilitators, supplanting a link to merchants and consumers the banking industry once owned.

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Today's Mobile Banking Apps: Table Stakes or Cutting Edge

There is no disputing that the U.S. mobile banking landscape is changing rapidly. Larger banks are setting the stage for broader market trends, while smaller banks (and even some regional players) play catch up in the development of new functionality.


What are some of the top U.S. banks doing that is innovative and what has quickly become table stakes in a game of mobile app one-upsmanship? And is mobile banking innovation becoming a value-added differentiator that can drive new revenues?


Over the past 18 months, mobile banking applications have evolved beyond the basics to include specialized functionalities, improved user experiences and an expansion of platforms supported. A year ago, mobile remote deposit capture (RDC) was live at only five of the top 13 banks. Today, it is a 'must have' banking application that has the potential to drive revenue. Similarly, P2P is now taking center stage at most banks despite some logistical hurdles, with five banks adding this functionality in the past 12 months.

How are banks keeping up with consumer demands? How are they keeping up with each other? What's next? In the third report in a series on the state of mobile banking released by the financial research and consulting firm Celent, a review of new application development is provided along with a glimpse into the future. 

In the 44-page report, The U.S. Mobile App Landscape: An Annual Evaluation of Mobile Banking at Top U.S. Banks, Celent found that larger banks tend to out-develop and out-adopt smaller institutions by a significant margin. “The channel is still relatively new, but leaders in the digital channel space are beginning to take offerings into the realm of value-added services that are context-sensitive, timely, and utilize big data", says Dan Latimore, senior vice president of Celent's Banking Group and coauthor of the report. "There’s a large disparity among digital offerings—industry leaders are light-years ahead of the laggards.”

Below is Celent's view of the mobile landscape as it continues to evolve. As can be seen, Emerging Capabilities include a more advanced stage of interaction with more knowledge-driven tools and analytics. While some of these may not be pursued by every organization, Celent believes most will be tomorrow's standard. Interestingly, some of the functionality in the Future Focus is already being implemented on a global basis (see previous post 'Banks Accelerate Mobile Banking Innovation', June 2013). 

While the future may be considered speculative, some components are beginning to appear at the more progressive institutions (U.S. Bank and BBVA Photo Bill Pay) and at some of the new players such as Moven, Simple, GoBank and BlueBird (see 'Challenger Brands & Disruptive Ideas: Learning From The NeoBanks', Financial Brand, August 2013).


Current Evolution of Mobile (Celent, June 2013)


Key Findings of the report include:
      • Mobile, and more broadly digital channels, have become core parts of banking in 2013. Mobile devices are now just as much a tool to keep people out of branches as they are to facilitate interaction. Consumers are more eager to engage through a smartphone, and as nontraditional players rush in to fill gaps left by legacy financial institutions, CIOs are beginning to feel the pressure to build out digital capabilities.
      • Digital channels are in a continuous process of evolution, proliferation, and adaption. While remote deposit capture was 'new' a year ago, it is now a basic functionality. Innovation in the mobile channels is ongoing with today's innovations quickly becoming tomorrow's table stakes. 
      • Banks are moving forward in their evolution of digital channels, but it's a slow and sometimes confusing process. It’s no surprise that banks aren’t considered innovators: it’s difficult, expensive, and risky to innovate. Yet, banking is entering a time of customer-centricity, where each institution defines this concept differently.
      • New functionality is on the horizon, but not yet front and center. This includes: 1) Speech recognition, 2) Social media integration, 3) Mobile PFM tools, 4) Easy access account balance, 5) Cardless cash withdrawal, 6) Debit card on/off switch, 7) Remote mobile bill pay, and 8) Biometric security.


How Are The Top Banks Doing?


Mobile is definitely moving beyond the replication of online banking services and into value-added features built to serve more specific use cases and even different segments of the bank (retail consumer, small business, wealth management, commercial, etc.). As shown above, the evolution is trending towards an environment where solutions are being 'bought' vs. 'built' and where engagement of the customer on a contextual level is beginning to be achieved. 

Using a features and functionality scoring sheet for each mobile platform (developed as part of the previous Celent research 'What's App, Doc: A Biannual Evaluation of Mobile Banking at Top U.S. Banks'), Celent evaluated apps for the Apple iOS, Android, Safari web browser and text banking. Scores were compiled for the top 13 banks in the U.S., with banks grouped into three categories based on the following criteria:
            • How easy was it to find the desired function?
            • How easy was the app to use?
            • Was the information presented intuitive from a navigation perspective?
            • Did the app take advantage of standard OS functionality to enhance familiarity?

A very in-depth evaluation was performed for the following functions on each mobile platform to determine breadth of offering. Each function was evaluated on a number of levels with values placed on each of the following capabilities: 
            • Balance inquiry
            • Recap of previous transactions
            • Bill payments
            • Moving money (RDC, A2A, P2P, etc.)
            • Merchant-funded rewards
            • PFM tools
            • Social Media integration
            • Geolocational tools
            • Marketing and sales
            • Security
            • Customer support
            • Personalization
            • Alerts

Celent grouped the banks in this report into the following three categories: most improved, noticeable improvements, and minimal/ no changes.
        1. The most improved apps include Bank of America and US Bank.
        2. Apps with noticeable improvements are Capital One, Wells Fargo, and HSBC.
        3. Banks with minimal or no changes to their mobile offerings include BB&T, Chase, Citibank, Fifth ThirdPNCRegions BankSunTrust and TD Bank.

According to Dan Latimore, "While Chase continues to build on their mobile excellence, some apps have been playing catch up." And while not making significant changes does not necessarily mean the mobile banking site was poor, standing still in today's mobile marketplace is not a solid long-term strategy.

Interestingly, in an unrelated research study conducted by Xtreme Labs for the period May 18 - June 1, 2013, entitled 'U.S. Banking Apps Report: Customer Reviews', a different set of 'winners' emerged based simply on the number of positive and negative customer ratings in both the Apple iTunes Store and Android Play Store. A minimum number of reviews were required for any app and an averaging of reviews was used for scaling. While significantly less scientific than the Celent research, the Xtreme Labs research provides a social media commentary on customer sentiment around mobile banking apps.

Of the largest banks reviewed by Xtreme Labs, RBS Citizens, had the highest score on the iOS platform (4.5 out of 5 and a 93% favorability rating) and one of the best scores on the Android platform (4.5 out of 5 and a 97% favorability rating). USAA, American Express, Wells, TD Bank, Chase, BB&T and Regions and U.S. Bank also scored well in this study.

Conversely, PNC (not virtual wallet), SunTrust, TD Bank, Fifth Third, Bank of America, Well Fargo and USAA also appeared on the negative side for the iOS platform in the Xtreme Lab study, indicating that the mobile apps were not considered the best for everyone.

Issues to Address in Future


Beyond the need to explore the development of additional functionality that makes engagement easier and leverages big data more effectively, Celent saw some trends they believed warrant attention in the near term.

Marketing and Cross-Selling

As was noted in my June 2013 blog post around Mapa Research's study of global mobile banking innovation, U.S. mobile banking apps still haven't leveraged some of the power of cross-selling from a mobile device. While the Celent research noted that many banks have attempted some form of 'product pushing' or advertising of services, there seems to be minimal leveraging of big data insights to drive contextual offers. "Splash screens and real estate crowding banner ads should be left to online banking", say Latimore. "Apps should move toward offering up product suggestions (without sacrificing user experience) as well as being able to facilitate the beginning of an enrollment process, which can be finished at the branch, over the phone or online".

Mapping

While it is understandable that many banks may be a bit skittish around using Apple Maps for branch and/or ATM directions given early flaws with the iOS application, using Google Maps from within the Safari browser was found to be slow and 'clunky' compared to the integrated option from Apple. Celent believes the risk may be worth it. Another option (used by both PNC Bank and U.S. Bank) may be the use of augmented reality for locational guides.

App Design and Platform Changes

Celent noticed that a number of apps in the study had little or no change from the previous report from Q4 2012. While this may not seem out of the ordinary if compared to bank website redesigns, and certainly falls in line with the industry's normal 'wait and see' approach, this speed of change is not acceptable to most mobile users who are used to constant and frequent enhancements to apps.

In addition, as tablets of all forms have exploded onto the marketplace, banks have done a terrible job of developing applications that take advantage of this very unique platform. Beyond the tactile and length of engagement differentiation of this platform, the demographics of the typical user (more affluent and more digitally astute) warrants a greater focus.

PFM on Mobile

There is no disputing that PFM on mobile has yet to gain any traction. Banks are struggling to define what PFM should be and what it should look like on different channels as well as platforms. The majority of consumers are not attracted to charts and graphs on mobile devices (there is a segment however). But PFM on mobile may provide promise if looked at in the perspective of improved receipts, budget updates and even gamification. Merchant-funded reward integration is also possible with geolocational capabilities providing the ability for immediate rewards through the mobile device.

While some banks are testing some of these capabilities (most notably the neobanks like Moven as covered here in my early 2013 blog post), there is quite a bit of debate on whether the investment in development can be recouped without a value-added pricing model.

According to Latimore, "Eventually, Celent imagines high-value advice on savings, alerts for overspending on a budget category, or GPS-enabled deals. The camera is another unique attribute to the mobile phone that can be used to provide a snapshot of spending."

The Long Road Ahead


Mobile banking has quickly evolved from being a more cost effective way to handle balance inquiries to a core component of every bank's delivery network. We have moved from a transaction focus to an engagement focus, with CIOs beginning to feel the pressure to build out mobile capabilities. 

With basic mobile transactions such as balance inquiry and moving money, simplicity is the 'new black'. With more sophisticated interactions, the use of 'big data' for insight dissemination and solution recommendations is the key to success. In all cases, Celent found a trend away from 'bolt-on modules' to more holistic approaches that will require significant investment.

While other industries have reached young adulthood in mobile integration, mobile banking is still in its infancy. With shrinking margins and more regulatory pressure, banks must determine if there is the potential for mobile services to generate revenue that can help offset development costs and replace lost fee income. Without fees from new value added services, what is the ROI of mobile banking? (see previous BMS post, 'The Revenue Power of Emerging Financial Solutions", August 2013)

According to Celent's Dan Latimore, "While mobile banking definitely expands a bank's ability to reach new and existing customers, and while there is significant movement by some organizations, there is still a long road ahead for others."

About the Report


The report reviewed is the third in Celent’s series on the state of mobile banking at top US financial institutions. The report examines mobile application offerings at the top 13 US banks in significant detail, beginning by looking at the state of the mobile market in the US. Celent graphically explains trends in mobile, and tries to make a case for what the future of mobile will look like. The report then dives deeply into the breadth of functionality and usability at each of these banks. Finally, each bank’s mobile application is profiled in depth, with accompanying screen shots to illustrate relevant points. This report is the best of its kind and is intended to serve as a guideline for conversations around how to strategically align mobile development with prevailing best practices.

A webinar on this study in conjunction with Kony, entitled, Tomorrow's Mobile Banking - Hear What Top U.S. Banks are Doing to Get a Glimpse Into the Crystal Ball is scheduled for September 11, 2013 at 2PM ET. 



Additional Resources


The U.S. Mobile App Landscape: An Annual Evaluation of Mobile Banking at Top U.S. Banks - Celent (June 2013)

Mobile Banker Vendor Solutions - Celent (April 2013)

What's App, Doc: An Updated Biannual Evaluation of Mobile Banking at Top U.S. Banks - Celent (January 2013)

U.S. Banking Apps Report: Customer Reviews - Xtreme Labs (July 2013)

Tomorrow's Mobile Banking - Hear What Top U.S. Banks are Doing to Get a Glimpse Into the Crystal Ball - American Banker Webinar sponsored by Kony (September 11, 2013)

Mobile in 2013: A Digital Digest Featuring Gartner Research - Kony (March 2013)


Subscribe to Bank Marketing Strategy Via Email



Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Banking Leaders Discuss 2014 Strategic Planning Priorities

As we enter the planning season with a marginally better economy than last year, banks and credit unions are faced with margin compression, high operating expenses, new competitors and channel disruption that challenge even the most efficiently run organizations. Therefore, it has never been more important for institutions to formulate a successful strategic plan.

To assist with this process, I asked some of the foremost global leaders in the banking and credit union industry to provide thoughts on what they believe are the 2014 strategic planning priorities. This blog post is a companion to the post done at the beginning of the year regarding trends expected in 2013.



Understanding that each financial institution and market is different, it was interesting the uniformity of priorities offered to bank and credit union management by the more than 30 industry leaders I interviewed for this post. And while the ability to execute against these strategic priorities may be impacted by size of organization and other dynamics, there was a consensus among those who I spoke with that 2014 may be one of the most important planning cycles ever.

Enhance the Customer Experience


Improving the customer experience was the foundation of almost all of the responses I received around 2014 strategic priorities. Whether we are talking about branch reconfiguration, mobile banking applications, back office operations, etc. banking industry leaders believe an improved customer experience is the key to growth. 

As was said by Mary Beth Sullivan and the team from Capital Performance Group in their May/June Newsletter, "Many banks have a long way to go to get the basics right, so banks and credit unions should focus first on the basics. Once the basics are humming, ask yourselves: What can we do to be sure that our customers are better off banking with us than with our competition? What will make our customers lives better? How can we help them solve specific problems they are dealing with? Answers to these questions will define the experience you seek to create."

Beyond 'the basics', other specific strategic initiatives were recommended by Steven J. Ramirez, CEO of Beyond the Arc. "Developing a proactive complain management process that goes beyond regulatory requirements can drive new customer experience projects", says Ramirez. He also believes financial institutions need to determine how they can be a finger swipe away from providing guidance and support through mobile devices.

Financial industry futurist and blogger Scott Bales believes bankers need to get out of the office and talk to real customers, developing empathy for their problems, behaviors and desires if they want to develop offerings that align with the needs of the market. According to Bales, "The goal is to build experiences, not products".



Sankar Krishnan from Sutherland Global sees customer experience as the 'X factor' across all channels and interactions the customer has with their financial institution. Comparing what banks need to strive for with customer experience leaders Apple, Amazon and Quicken Loans, Krishman believes banks need to excel at aligning people, process and technology. 

Sam Maule from Carlisle & Gallagher Consulting Group believes that recent start-upssuch as Moven and Simple (and perennial cx leader USAA) are the best at visual engagement and customer experience. He quoted one of his banking clients as saying, "I would pay $500K for ONE great user experience designer. FSI's are horrible at this. We have massive data systems, huge BI tools, and more, but none of that means jack for consumers if there isn't an amazing user experience."

Finally, best selling author and acclaimed management advisor Joe Pine believes banks and credit unions must go beyond providing just checking accounts and loans.




Subscribe to Bank Marketing Strategies


Define Mobile Positioning


In response to the growth in smartphone adoption and customer demand, most financial institutions offer basic mobile services. But those are just table stakes. Going forward, banks and credit unions now need to determine how to position this channel for the future. 

Senior Aite analyst and Snarketing 2.0 blogger Ron Shevlin states, "The most important strategic question banks and credit unions need to address is how will the mobile channel help FIs add more value to the customer relationship, help differentiate the institution, and create a strategic advantage". He adds, "If the 2014 strategic planning process can answer these questions, it will drive decisions regarding pricing, product offerings and customer segmentation."

Noted technologist Bradley Leimer from Mechanics Bank agrees that banks need to move beyond 'mobile banking 1.0' and adopt a mobile-first mindset in regard to application development, marketing, service and transactional functionality. According to Leimer, "Banks need to build simplified journeys similar to those offered by Moven, Simple, Bluebird, GoBank and USAA." (Leimer expands on his strategic planning thoughts on his Discerning Technologist blog here). 

Senior marketing professional, Lori Philo-Cook from InnovoMarketing believes that financial institutions also need to improve the marketing of the mobile channel to customers, including enhanced training of employees and one-on-one demonstrations to customers. "The key is to better understand the needs of customers and provide personal demonstrations on how mobile banking can meet these needs", says Philo-Cook.

Multimedia and special projects editor of Finextra, Elizabeth Lumley believes it is time for banks to go beyond just mobile banking improvements and to place their bets on mobile payment partnerships. While the winners in payments have not been determined, she believes waiting is not an option.




Integrate Delivery Channels


As noted by Capital Performance Group in their May/June newsletter strategic planning article, everyone is talking about the future of branches because there is so much fixed cost tied up in this channel where fewer and fewer transactions are taking place. The challenge is not the opening or closing of a branch, however. It is the ability to integrate capabilities and information across channels, delivering an consistent experience.

Dominic Venturo
, chief innovation officer at U.S. Bank believes banks and credit unions need to quickly adjust to the disruption in financial delivery channels. "Now that the majority of consumers in the US are carrying a smart-phone of some type and the technology has been used to eliminate the need to visit a branch for many activities (opening account, depositing a check, paying a bill, sending a gift card, etc) how will the delivery model of your institution change to remain relevant?", says Venturo. He adds, "The mobile wave started just a few short years ago and has already changed how we do business. Planning for the future of delivery should have already started, but if it hasn't, now is a good time."

Another retail banking executive at a top 5 financial institution believes FIs need to move to omnichannel banking which maximizes cross-channel consistency and provides a seamless user experience where and when the customers desires. This includes scenarios where the customer may begin their transaction using one channel and finish it with another.

To this end, Nicole Sturgill, research director for retail banking at CEB TowerGroup recommends, "Adjust channel strategy from ‘all transactions in all channels’ to ‘seamless integration across channels’. Our research shows that consumers prefer reduced effort over choice. They’d rather know which channels will be fastest and work best than try a channel that doesn’t work for what they’re trying to achieve. Instead banks and credit unions should focus efforts on ensuring that customers can move easily from one channel to another without degrading the experience."

Industry recognized innovator Matthew Wilcox also believes 2014 should be the year of breaking down internal channel silos and to determine how banks and credit unions can leverage channels to not just allow the client to self-serve, but to provide a positive full-service experience regardless of the channel.


Unfortunately, the back office of many financial institutions makes it difficult to break down silos that have been in place for years says Fred Hagerman, chief marketing officer of Firstmark Credit Union. He still believes that a disconnected experience has risks.



Both Virginia-based chief marketing officer of GeezeoBryan Clagett, anMarket Insights' senior strategist Jim Perry from Chicago agree that financials should get out of their branch-based comfort zone.



London-based mobile/digital consultant for Keatan and publisher of The Bold War blog, Michael Nuciforo may state it best when he says that banks must move from a perspective of self-service (getting customers to do hated tasks themselves) to selfless service (where we focus on how the customer wants to interact). "New technology and changing customer behaviors mean that there are widening gaps between the processes of the past and the expectations of the new", says Nuciforo.


Reduce Enterprise Costs


It is no surprise to financial institutions of all sizes and in all countries that costs must be reduced as revenues have decreased and margins remain low. Many banks and credit unions have made cost reduction a perennial foundation of their strategic planning process, but more needs to be done in 2014.

"Banks must manage the cost base of the physical infrastructure and staff costs in branches to ensure that overhead of traditional operations are minimized while effectiveness of such operations are maximized", offers the Chairman of the London-based Financial Services Club, Chris Skinner

Bob Palmer, global financial services marketing lead at IBM agrees that there needs to be a continuation of the enterprise cost reduction strategies that are already in place. He believes these initiatives need to include a more aggressive reduction in workforce with a correlated reconfiguration/reduction of branch networks.

Melanie Friedrichs, analyst at Andera feels automation of core banking services also needs to occur. "For most institutions, I think that cost cutting through the better application of existing technology is the easiest path to a better margin", stated Friedrichs. Specific examples she provided include: increasing the percentage of deposit accounts and loans originated online, creating incentives to use online or mobile banking over branches and call centers, and investing in technology, perhaps even branch automation technology, to improve staff efficiency.

Author, 2012 American Banker Innovator of the Year, 'Breaking Banks' radio host and founder of Moven Brett King believes that banks need to dig even deeper for cost reductions. In his normal disruptive style, he challenges traditional financial organizations to make a significant paradigm shift.






Fellow disruptive thinker Deva Annamalai from Zions Bank agrees that banks need to identify processes that are outdated and archaic and get rid of them. "There is nothing more dangerous than sticking to things that we have done in the past because we are too lazy to change them," says Annamalai. "Your customers' tolerance for unneeded traditions like signature cards and other long and costly processes is wearing thin. Competitors who provide simplified, frictionless banking are ready to serve these customers."

Optirate CEO, Serge Milman adds that the future of banking may require additional scale. "Scale is needed to diversify 'concentration risk' (customer, geographic and product), attain lower funding costs, reduce unit costs, absorb regulatory burden and gain access to a broader base of potential customers," says Milman. "Options include organic growth and acquisitions."

Leverage Data


The discussion of 'big data' permeates our industry trade publication, industry meetings and blogs like mine (see here, here and here). This is because most financials sit on some of the richest sources of data of any industry, yet we rarely leverage it as effectively as possible. 

Recognized top innovator Matthew Wilcox states that while investments in innovation data management are up, banks still lag behind other disruptive companies in recognizing payoffs. "Banks have a strong hold on massive amounts of customer data and understand that their data is truly a gold mine", says Wilcox. He adds, "Initially, banks should avoid major new data initiatives until they get good at using the data they already have". 

Scott Bales suggests that banks may want to look outside their organization for help. "Bankers may want to look to data scientists, who can create stories from data to derive patterns, trends, insights and add context to interactions with consumers. The bank who best leverages their data best will ultimately win." 

Fred Hagerman from Firstmark Credit Union agrees. 



Understanding and processing data from various internal systems is imperative according to Zions' Deva Annamalai. "Break down data silos within the organization and facilitate information flow which will lead to a better customer experience," states Annamalai.

A strategic priority for banks should include the delivery of a mature enterprise data management structure that provides true parity based reporting between operational, performance and financial information", offers Jeff Fisher, director at Perficient. "From here, banks should build capabilities to further extend a bank’s ability to segment customer data and create a solid foundation to execute on a strategy to monetize customer data".

Sam Maule from Carlisle & Gallagher Consulting Group agrees and adds, "We all must be better at drilling into the contextual data that matters for customer engagement and not on creating executive dashboards for PowerPoint decks. Data analytics must lead to actual application and engagement with consumers, from customer acquisition to origination, marketing, education, collections, fraud, etc."

Nicole Sturgill from CEB TowerGroup believes that channel preference would be a great starting place for many financial institutions. "Know a customer’s preferred channels, both individually and in the aggregate. At the individual level, understanding how a customer wants to bank can drive how they are served, what products are offered, and how they are offered. At the macro level, understanding the channel preferences of the customer base can drive strategic decisions on channel investments as well as management structure."

Improve Marketing and Sales Effectiveness


As I discussed last month in my blog, the consumer purchasing funnel has changed forever, with the majority of consumers beginning their purchase process using online channels and less and less frequently preferring to visit a branch to open a new account. This new paradigm requires a shift in marketing emphasis from 'push' marketing, where mass media would bombard a consumer with messages, to 'pull' marketing, where time, place, offer and channel become much more important. 

This significant change in the purchase process requires a rethinking of strategic priorities for bank marketers in 2014 and beyond. 

James Robert Lay, president of PTP New Media and advisor to the credit union industry is a strong advocate of building a digital strategy that will lead to increased leads and sales. According to Lay, "Moving to digital channels requires banks and credit unions to stop thinking about digital as a tool that works independently of other channels and processes, but instead works together as part of a system or process." Lay continues, "Once banks and credit unions accept that the business model will need to change when dealing in a digital world, banks and credit unions need to explore how digital can align with people and products around a unified purpose."

London-based retail channel director at MisysAlex Bray emphasizes that the future reduction in branches across the globe will require digital marketing acumen. "Banks and credit unions need to build relationships, differentiate brands and identify customer needs through digital channels instead of face to face as branches disappear," states Bray. "I think gamification and social media marketing will also play a big role here as will the importance of 'one-touch' mobile marketing."

Financial Services Club's Chris Skinner also believes that a strategic priority for 2014 will be to find ways to leverage social media and mobile for growing share of wallet through deepening customer relationships.

Finally, Elizabeth Dias, financial services and retail marketing manager at Perficient speaks for many of the banking leaders interviewed around the new strategic direction of marketing. "Successful financial services innovators will start to leverage a more integrated portfolio of technologies to be where their customers are today and identify new ways to create utility with their digital marketing strategies for tomorrow," says Dias. "There is a great opportunity for marketers to use tools like Vine, Instagram, Twitter, Facebook and Google or to develop a mobile app to solve a problem, make life easier, and of course engage with the customer as they map the digital customer journey."

Define a Differentiation Strategy


According to the list of strategic planning priorities developed by Capital Performance Group, there has never been a better (or more important) time to identify your institution's niche. How do you become the 'go to' financial provider for a specific retail or business segment? And how can you increase revenues (and potentially reduce costs) through this differentiation at a time when the consumer thinks all financial providers look pretty much the same?

According to Keatan's Michael Nuciforo, it may be as 'simple' (or difficult) as being the firm that executes the best against their plan. "The banks that are winning are the banks that are delivering," says Nuciforo. "They have refocused not on analysis paralysis, but on quality and speed of delivery." 

Serge Milman from Optirate and Melanie Friedrichs from Andera voice a similar warning around building differentiation in a crowded marketplace. While they agree that banks and credit unions need to develop strategies to set themselves apart in the marketplace, they both emphasize that there needs to be a highly focused commitment to the strategy.

Amber Farley, director of interactive services and media at Financial Marketing Solutions in Nashville, reminds us that, "Companies that usually do the best are ones that have a brand that permeates throughout the entire organization. The best companies value customer service and they make consumers want to be a part of their story". She suggests that more time and investment should be spent on internal branding initiatives by improving internal communication and energizing the organization. 

"Once each member of the entire team (from executives to the front line staff) is a brand ambassador for the bank, I think it is equally important to communicate the brand message in a consistent and aesthetically pleasing manner so that community members desire to be a part of the story. That's how life-long customers are made". 

Finally, fintech technologist Bradley Leimer emphasizes that differentiation (and innovation) do not need to be created internally or in a vacuum. Instead, he emphasizes the power of partnership with outside providers. If your firm is not able to address all of the external requirements of your customers and the marketplace, are unable to test, iterate or develop agile or lean processes that can help differentiate your organization, or simplify the customer journey and build a unique customer experience, partnering with an outside disrupter that can lead the way may be a better option. (read more about Bradley's perspective here).

Revenue, Security and Regulation


As was very profoundly offered by SourceMedia's Editor in Chief Penny Crosman, the financial services industry can't ignore the 'elephants in the room' . . . the ongoing need for revenue, the increasing importance of improved security and the reality of a heightened compliance environment. The negative impact of neglecting any of any of these strategic priorities could easily offset any benefits from the strategies discussed above.


Finding new ways to generate fees from new innovations or established products, testing new security options which will allow for greater acceptance of mobile banking and mobile payments and finding ways to improve compliance with fewer dedicated resources will be 'must haves' in 2014.


Keys to a Successful Planning Process


Whatever strategic initiatives are agreed to by a bank's or credit union's management, it should be shared and communicated with bank employees so they understand the organizations’s mission, vision, goals, and objectives and the employees’ role in achieving the objectives.

In its simplest form, a bank’s strategic planning process should answer the following four questions:
            1. Where are we now?
            2. Where do we want to be?
            3. How do we get there?
            4. How do we measure our progress?
In today's marketplace the strategic planning process must be dynamic and focused. Unfortunately, at many institutions I visit, the process becomes nothing more than an adjustment to the prior year's plan without adjustments that reflect the rapidly changing industry dynamics. In others, there is a lack of unified focus that can lead to disruption and competing priorities.

Simply going through the motions is a recipe for disaster as articulated by credit union advocate Tim McAlpine, president of Canadian-based Currency Marketing and Jeff Marsico, EVP of bank strategy at The Kafafian Group and fellow blogger.




Fintech advisor and CEO of ClientificJ.P. Nicols cautions, "Too many banks try to be all things to all people, and the universal bank model really needs significant scale to work. Bank executives should spend a a good share of their strategic planning time evaluating all of the businesses they are in (or not in) and make an honest assessment of potential growth rates and the investments and scale needed for success".  He adds, "Business lines not making the grade should be divested or closed and the investments diverted to lines where they can legitimately compete and win". 

I hope some of these suggested strategic priorities help in your 2014 planning process. Thanks to the dozens of financial service leaders that were so kind to share their thoughts.

If you have other priorities that you believe will help your fellow FI associates, I would love to have you post these in the comments section.

Additional Resources


Strategic Priorities for 2014 Planning - Capital Performance Group (June 2013)

Banking Leaders Predict Major 2013 Trends - Bank Marketing Strategy (January 2013)

Strategic Plans That Make A Difference - Mary Beth Sullivan for BAI Banking Strategies (August 2012)

Semiannual Risk Assessment: Spring 2013 - Comptroller of the Currency (June 2013)


Meaningful Strategic Planning Can Happen - ABA Banking Journal (May 2012)


Subscribe to Bank Marketing Strategy Via Email




Delivered by FeedBurner